Benchmarks: RTX vs RX for 1440p gaming

RTX vs RX for 1440p gaming remains the fiercest battleground in modern PC hardware, a critical decision point for anyone serious about high-resolution performance.

In 2025, the 1440p resolution is no longer a niche for enthusiasts; it is the sweet spot, balancing stunning visual detail with the high refresh rates that competitive gamers demand.

Choosing between NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX and AMD’s Radeon RX lineup means evaluating more than just raw framerates it involves assessing Ray Tracing capability, upscaling technology maturity, and, crucially, the long-term value proposition for your investment.

This analysis goes beyond simple specification sheets, diving into real-world benchmarks and feature ecosystems that define the 1440p experience today.

Both giants offer compelling hardware that excels at pushing pixels, yet their philosophies diverge significantly when handling complex rendering tasks.

Understanding these differences is paramount to building a rig that dominates titles like Elden Ring: Shadow of the Erdtree or Cyberpunk 2077: Ultimate Edition at fluid framerates and maximum fidelity.

We will uncover which architectural approach delivers the most consistent and feature-rich gaming experience in this high-demand resolution bracket.

Which GPU Architectures Power RTX vs RX for 1440p gaming Now?

What is the Core Technology Behind the Latest Cards?

NVIDIA currently leverages its cutting-edge Ada Lovelace architecture, featured in the GeForce RTX 40-Series cards, optimized for both rasterization and AI-powered performance.

These GPUs rely heavily on specialized hardware: the 4th generation Tensor Cores for DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) and the 3rd generation RT Cores for accelerated Ray Tracing calculations.

This dedicated feature set significantly enhances performance in titles that support their technologies, particularly at demanding resolutions like 1440p.

Meanwhile, AMD counters with its RDNA 3 architecture, powering the Radeon RX 7000 Series, which focuses on a chiplet design in some high-end models to maximize efficiency and reduce manufacturing costs.

RDNA 3 significantly improved its Ray Tracing capabilities over RDNA 2 and introduced FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution) 3 with Frame Generation.

The RDNA 3 strategy emphasizes strong rasterization performance per dollar, offering highly competitive framerates in conventional games without relying as heavily on proprietary AI hardware.

++ Best PC cases for airflow and aesthetics

Why is VRAM Capacity Suddenly a Decisive Factor at 1440p?

Historically, 1440p was manageable with 8GB of Video RAM, but game asset quality has exploded, making VRAM a critical bottleneck in 2025.

Modern AAA games, especially with high-resolution texture packs and Ray Tracing enabled, routinely demand 12GB to 16GB of VRAM to prevent stuttering and frame drops.

Many of AMD’s offerings in the 1440p tier, such as the RX 7700 XT and RX 7800 XT, offer higher VRAM capacities (up to 16GB) than their direct NVIDIA competitors, providing better “future-proofing” for texture-heavy environments.

This VRAM advantage for the RX line minimizes texture swapping, ensuring a smoother experience when testing the limits of RTX vs RX for 1440p gaming.

How Does Ray Tracing Performance Compare Between NVIDIA and AMD?

Why is NVIDIA Still Dominant in Ray Tracing Performance?

NVIDIA maintains a noticeable lead in Ray Tracing fidelity and performance, a key area when debating RTX vs RX for 1440p gaming.

The dedicated RT Cores in the RTX architecture are simply more efficient at handling the complex, parallel calculations required for real-time light simulation.

This advantage translates directly to playable framerates when activating ultra Ray Tracing settings in demanding games like Alan Wake 2 or Hogwarts Legacy.

Although AMD’s RDNA 3 architecture significantly improved its Ray Tracing throughput, it still requires a more substantial performance hit compared to NVIDIA’s counterpart, often necessitating greater reliance on upscaling to remain above 60 FPS at 1440p.

For the discerning gamer prioritizing bleeding-edge lighting, shadows, and reflections, the RTX cards remain the undisputed champion.

A recent Digital Foundry analysis confirmed that even mid-range RTX 40-Series cards maintain a 15-20% Ray Tracing performance lead over similarly priced RX 7000-Series counterparts at 1440p resolution.

Also read: Guide to stream decks: is it worth it?

Where Does Pure Rasterization Performance Edge Out the Competition?

When is the AMD RX Line the Clear Winner at 1440p?

If a gamer strictly prioritizes raw rasterization performance gaming without Ray Tracing and focusing solely on the highest possible framerate for competitive titles AMD’s Radeon RX cards often deliver superior performance-per-dollar.

The RDNA 3 architecture shines in conventional rendering pipelines, providing excellent throughput for games like Forza Horizon 5, Apex Legends, or Valorant.

In the mid-to-high-end 1440p bracket, an RX 7800 XT frequently trades blows or slightly outperforms an RTX 4070 in non-Ray Tracing benchmarks, sometimes at a lower market price.

This efficiency in traditional rendering makes the RX series a fantastic choice for those who value maximum smoothness on a high refresh rate monitor and don’t care about the cinematic fluff of Ray Tracing.

AMD effectively offers the most FPS for your buck when evaluating RTX vs RX for 1440p gaming purely on conventional merit.

Read more: The rise of OLED gaming displays

Average Frame Rate Comparison at 1440p (Ultra Settings)

To illustrate the competitive landscape, consider the average frames per second (FPS) across a suite of demanding games.

This data, drawn from Q3 2025 performance aggregates, clearly shows the trade-offs:

Source: Aggregated data from tech publications Q3 2025 GPU benchmarks.

Notice the RX 7900 XT leads the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in pure rasterization, reflecting AMD’s architectural efficiency.

Yet, the NVIDIA card takes a substantial lead once high-fidelity Ray Tracing is introduced, showing the power of the dedicated RT cores.

This difference is the core conundrum of the RTX vs RX for 1440p gaming choice.

Why is the Feature Ecosystem a Tie-Breaker in RTX vs RX for 1440p gaming?

What Advantages Does the NVIDIA Ecosystem Provide?

NVIDIA’s ecosystem extends far beyond raw gaming, offering a suite of proprietary tools that enhance productivity and streaming.

Features like NVIDIA Broadcast use Tensor Cores to provide AI-powered noise reduction, virtual backgrounds, and camera tracking, which are invaluable for content creators and streamers.

Furthermore, DLSS has a far higher adoption rate in new AAA titles compared to FSR, meaning a new game is almost guaranteed to launch with the NVIDIA upscaling solution.

The stability of NVIDIA’s drivers and software suite, historically, has given them an edge in reliability, offering a more “plug-and-play” experience.

The comprehensive software toolkit makes the RTX lineup a better integrated solution for users who game, create content, and stream simultaneously, essentially offering more utility for the hardware investment.

What is AMD’s Growing Strength in Software and Community?

AMD fights back with its commitment to open standards, most notably with FSR.

Since FSR is not tied to proprietary hardware, it runs on almost any modern GPU, including older NVIDIA cards and consoles, leading to broader industry adoption outside of the initial launch window.

For the consumer, this means FSR support is more universal, even if it might be visually inferior to DLSS in some edge cases.

AMD’s software suite, Adrenalin Edition, is highly regarded for its robust overlay, detailed performance tuning, and the introduction of HYPR-RX, a single-click solution that automatically applies several performance-enhancing technologies like Radeon Anti-Lag and Boost.

This focus on simplifying performance management appeals directly to the user who prefers a streamlined, non-proprietary experience when comparing RTX vs RX for 1440p gaming.

Final Verdict: Which Path Should You Choose for 1440p?

Choosing the victor in RTX vs RX for 1440p gaming is less about finding a single “best” card and more about aligning the GPU with your personal gaming philosophy.

Consider your monitor: if you own a 240Hz competitive monitor and play mostly fast-paced shooters, the high rasterization FPS and lower cost of the RX line offer the best value.

If your monitor is a beautiful 144Hz screen and you are constantly seeking the graphical maximum Ray Tracing, ultra settings, and cinematic immersion the RTX line’s feature superiority makes it the wiser choice.

The reality is that 80% of gamers on PC are currently using monitors with a refresh rate of 120Hz or less, according to a recent hardware survey (Q3 2025 data).

This means the majority of users need consistent, stable performance, not just peak theoretical framerates.

Both NVIDIA and AMD deliver this stability at 1440p, but the RTX line currently offers a more robust path to the highest visual fidelity features.

Ultimately, your budget is the final gatekeeper. The RX line delivers 90% of the performance for perhaps 75% of the cost in the middle tier.

However, the superior Ray Tracing and DLSS 3 of the RTX line currently justify their premium for the enthusiast who refuses to compromise on graphical features.

Analyze the games you actually play, look at the benchmarks, and make an informed choice. Share your experience and which GPU you chose for 1440p gaming in the comments below!

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Does 1440p gaming require 12GB of VRAM or more?

Yes, absolutely. For current AAA games (2025), especially those with high-resolution textures and Ray Tracing, 12GB is the minimum recommended to prevent performance bottlenecks.

16GB is highly advisable for true future-proofing at 1440p Ultra settings.

Is Ray Tracing worth the FPS loss at 1440p?

It depends on your preference. For cinematic, single-player games, the visual upgrade from Ray Tracing is substantial and often worth the FPS trade-off, especially when combined with upscaling (DLSS/FSR).

For competitive titles, Ray Tracing should be disabled to prioritize maximum framerate and lowest latency.

Can I use AMD’s FSR with an NVIDIA RTX card?

Yes. FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution) is an open-source technology, meaning it works on virtually all modern GPUs, including NVIDIA RTX cards.

However, FSR will usually be slightly less performant and visually refined than NVIDIA’s proprietary DLSS when run on an RTX card.

What is the main difference between DLSS 3 and FSR 3?

The primary difference is the use of dedicated AI hardware.

DLSS 3 utilizes the Tensor Cores on RTX cards to generate entirely new frames (Frame Generation) and perform superior upscaling.

FSR 3 uses publicly available algorithms, making it hardware-agnostic, but often resulting in a slightly less stable image quality in the upscaling process compared to DLSS.

Juscilene Alves 24 de October de 2025